obj:
The object relation is used for the secondary participant of transitive verbs. In an ergative construction, the object is in direct case and triggers person-number agreement with the verb. If an ergative construction receives a passive interpretation, the object is annotated as nsubj:pass. Object clauses are annotated as ccomp. In a possessive construction, the possessum is encoded as subject.
Indirect objects can formally not be differentiated from direct objects. We identify that participant as indirect, which is normally flagged with a preposition in other attestations (typically the recipient or addressee).
Objects are frequently omitted as known, active referents.
- “And why did (he) allow harm to befall (his) creatures?”
ud wizend ō dāmān čim padīrift \n and harm to creatures why accepted cc(padīrift, ud) obj(padīrift, wizend) case(dāmān, ō) obl(padīrift, dāmān) advmod((padīrift, čim) - “And will (he) throw him back by force?”
u =š pad nērōg abāz abganēd \n and him by strength back throws cc(abganēd, u) obj(abganēd, =š) case(nērōg, pad) obl(abganēd, nērōg) advmod(abganēd, abāz) - “That woman does not have property to the extent that she were able to sustain herself and the child.”
ān zan xwāstag ōwōn nēst kū =š xwēštan ud frazend dāštan tuwān \n that woman property such not_is that her self and child keep able mark(tuwān, kū) nsubj(tuwān, =š) xcomp(tuwān, dāštan) obj(dāštan, xwēštan) conj(xwēštan, frazend) cc(frazend, ud)
obj in other languages: [axm] [bej] [bg] [bm] [cop] [cs] [de] [el] [en] [es] [ess] [et] [eu] [fi] [fr] [fro] [ga] [gsw] [hbo] [hy] [it] [ja] [ka] [kk] [kmr] [ky] [lt] [mr] [naq] [no] [oge] [pal] [pcm] [pt] [qpm] [ro] [ru] [sl] [ssp] [sv] [swl] [tr] [u] [uz] [vi] [xcl] [yue] [zh]