This is part of archived UD v1 documentation. See http://universaldependencies.org/ for the current version.

home sl/pos issue tracker

CONJ: coordinating conjunction

Definition

A coordinating conjunction is a word that links words or larger constituents without syntactically subordinating one to the other and expresses a semantic relationship between them.

Examples

• in, pa, ter “and”
• ali, oziroma “or”
• vendar “however”; toda, ampak “but”
• namreč “namely”
• saj “as/since”

Conversion from JOS

All conjunctions with Type=coordinating become CONJ.

---

Treebank Statistics (UD_Slovenian)

There are 22 CONJ lemmas (0%), 25 CONJ types (0%) and 5701 CONJ tokens (4%). Out of 16 observed tags, the rank of CONJ is: 12 in number of lemmas, 13 in number of types and 9 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent CONJ lemmas: in, pa, ali, saj, ter, vendar, zato, namreč, a, toda

The 10 most frequent CONJ types: in, pa, ali, ter, saj, vendar, zato, namreč, a, toda

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: in (CONJ 3242, ADV 5, X 1), pa (CONJ 957, X 1), ali (CONJ 337, ADV 77), vendar (CONJ 140, ADV 5), zato (CONJ 119, ADV 64), a (CONJ 96, ADV 2, X 1), tako (ADV 368, CONJ 56), ne (PART 740, CONJ 22), niti (PART 49, CONJ 16), sicer (PART 82, CONJ 5)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: in (CONJ 3129, ADV 5, X 1), pa (CONJ 931, X 1), ali (CONJ 324, ADV 45), vendar (CONJ 91, ADV 5), zato (CONJ 67, ADV 60), a (CONJ 65, ADV 1), tako (ADV 296, CONJ 44, DET 8), ne (PART 664, CONJ 20), niti (PART 43, CONJ 15), sicer (PART 60, CONJ 5)

• in
  • CONJ 3129: Stala je milijardo tolarjev in dvesto petdeset milijonov .
  • ADV 5: Geto je out , črnci so in .
  • X 1: Med tem pripravljalnim delom je EUA spomladi 2003 sprejela tudi svoj odgovor na sporočilo Evropske komisije The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge , ki je postal še eno od izhodišč za kasnejše razprave v Gradcu .
• pa
  • CONJ 931: Bojim pa se , da ne bodo ravno realni .
  • X 1: ( pa )
• ali
  • CONJ 324: In ali nadzira tudi politične nasprotnike in navadne državljane .
  • ADV 45: Že dolgo poslušam in sledim , ali bi bili kakšni takšni nameni .
• vendar
  • CONJ 91: Pa vendar - čim lažji korak voščim in prižigam pipico miru !
  • ADV 5: Saj smo vendar prišli študirat pravo zato , da ju bomo iskali in našli .
• zato
  • CONJ 67: Zdaj pa je že začelo zmanjkovati prostora , zato se obrača na jugovzhod .
  • ADV 60: Finančno ministrstvo ima zato legitimno pravico , da predlaga rešitev .
• a
  • CONJ 65: Moj oče je bil rojen pred 105 leti , a ni bil najmlajši otrok .
  • ADV 1: Ne bi bilo pravično zahtevati , naj Nemčija še naprej podpira tri evropske vogale , v zameno pa bi morala Berlin in Pariz prenehati razglašati , da je njuna politika že a priori dobra za vse .
• tako
  • ADV 296: Naj bo tako , čeprav vas nihče ne bo podpiral , in daleč boste prišli .
  • CONJ 44: “ Bilo je veliko lepih daril , tako da se je le za eno težko odločiti .
  • DET 8: Vdilj ima le enega sina je tako drevo še dvojiško ?
• ne
  • PART 664: Trenutna zakonodaja ne odraža zahtev in potreb industrijskih podjetij .
  • CONJ 20: Vendar o krvi ni ne duha ne sluha .
• niti
  • PART 43: Če te ne bi bilo , ne bi pomagal niti izredno ugoden splet okoliščin .
  • CONJ 15: Zgodovina človeštva ni niti logična niti pravična .
• sicer
  • PART 60: Sodišče sicer ni dvomilo , da je bila res pretepena .
  • CONJ 5: Evropa mora ohraniti kulture , ki so jo ustvarile , sicer bo usahnila .

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of CONJ is 1.136364 (the average of all parts of speech is 1.894262).

The 1st highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “ali”: al, ali.

The 2nd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “saj”: saj, sej.

The 3rd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “tako”: tako, takó.

CONJ does not occur with any features.

Relations

CONJ nodes are attached to their parents using 6 different relations: cc (4588; 80% instances), advmod (1036; 18% instances), cc:preconj (61; 1% instances), mwe (14; 0% instances), conj (1; 0% instances), root (1; 0% instances)

Parents of CONJ nodes belong to 14 different parts of speech: VERB (2650; 46% instances), NOUN (1835; 32% instances), ADJ (806; 14% instances), PROPN (216; 4% instances), ADV (79; 1% instances), PRON (49; 1% instances), NUM (38; 1% instances), CONJ (8; 0% instances), PART (7; 0% instances), DET (5; 0% instances), ADP (3; 0% instances), X (3; 0% instances), AUX (1; 0% instances), ROOT (1; 0% instances)

5644 (99%) CONJ nodes are leaves.

53 (1%) CONJ nodes have one child.

3 (0%) CONJ nodes have two children.

1 (0%) CONJ nodes have three or more children.

The highest child degree of a CONJ node is 3.

Children of CONJ nodes are attached using 4 different relations: mwe (53; 85% instances), punct (7; 11% instances), advmod (1; 2% instances), conj (1; 2% instances)

Children of CONJ nodes belong to 5 different parts of speech: SCONJ (25; 40% instances), PART (19; 31% instances), CONJ (8; 13% instances), PUNCT (7; 11% instances), ADV (3; 5% instances)

---

Treebank Statistics (UD_Slovenian-SST)

There are 23 CONJ lemmas (1%), 23 CONJ types (0%) and 1631 CONJ tokens (6%). Out of 16 observed tags, the rank of CONJ is: 13 in number of lemmas, 14 in number of types and 9 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent CONJ lemmas: pa, in, ali, ampak, saj, tako, oziroma, torej, sicer, vendarle

The 10 most frequent CONJ types: pa, in, ali, ampak, saj, tako, oziroma, torej, sicer, vendarle

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: in (CONJ 414, ADV 1, X 1), ali (CONJ 113, ADV 12), tako (ADV 233, CONJ 51), torej (CONJ 28, ADV 11), sicer (CONJ 15, PART 14), zato (ADV 20, CONJ 6), a (ADV 137, INTJ 16, NOUN 6, CONJ 3, X 1), ne (PART 787, CONJ 2), razen (ADJ 1, CONJ 1, ADP 1)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: in (CONJ 414, ADV 1, X 1), ali (CONJ 113, ADV 12), tako (ADV 233, CONJ 51, DET 9, PRON 2), torej (CONJ 28, ADV 11), sicer (CONJ 15, PART 14), zato (ADV 20, CONJ 6), a (ADV 137, INTJ 16, NOUN 6, X 4, CONJ 3), ne (PART 787, CONJ 2), razen (ADP 1, CONJ 1)

• in
  • CONJ 414: tako življenje je bilo prej in in sedaj je
  • ADV 1: eee poleg one ta glavne … poleg one ki je ki je bila najbolj in
  • X 1: aaa spreminja pa se vsebina operacije nato training mission in irak
• ali
  • CONJ 113: saj še ne vem kam v avstralijo ali pa v ameriko
  • ADV 12: torej paul david hewson … si ugibal ali veš kdo je to ?
• tako
  • ADV 233: pa si bil že kaj doma nisi bil še nič tako
  • CONJ 51: tako da
  • DET 9: tako življenje je bilo prej in in sedaj je
  • PRON 2: tako bi jaz imela
• torej
  • CONJ 28: torej pač iz eee pač tozadevnega specialista no … mhm mhm mhm
  • ADV 11: vode kaj torej tiste puščice pomenijo ?
• sicer
  • CONJ 15: mislim sicer eem okej ful sem pogrešala jaz kolege pa to ful
  • PART 14: dobro jutro bom rekel sicer je že ma [gap] še malo zgodaj za zjutraj
• zato
  • ADV 20: zato ker mestni avtobusi imajo zelo slab izkoristek
  • CONJ 6: se zelo s [gap] zato je zelo slab izkoristek a ne
• a
  • ADV 137: [gap] kaj a tule boš diplomirala pol boš šla pa ven magisterij delat ?
  • INTJ 16: [:voice] a sok je meni dober ne v bistvu iz jabolk mi je ful všeč
  • NOUN 6: glej točko a zrcali geotrikotnik imaš glej koliko imaš teh trikotnikov
  • X 4: a [gap] ampak jaz se ga spomnim kot profesorja ki sebe daje
  • CONJ 3: a jaz ja takvida
• ne
  • PART 787: ja ne moreš
  • CONJ 2: no pri eee prispevku pri registraciji bi [gap] za sto evrov in gotovo pa pa ne bi bilo ne vinjet pa ne kontrole na cesti pa razmetavanja za take neumnosti
• razen
  • ADP 1: [:voice] samo od uze [gap] izobraževanja samo še to da zdaj je pa marec sredina marca in mislim da moram da razen datumov za junijsko izobraževanje nimamo nič drugega še in da je zdaj pač čas da eem pač dorečemo kaj bomo in kako bomo a ne
  • CONJ 1: ti ma [gap] okej razen pač tvojo predstavitev deset do petnajst pol pa še pogovora toliko ne

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of CONJ is 1.000000 (the average of all parts of speech is 1.575031).

The 1st highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “a”: a.

The 2nd highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “aber”: aber.

The 3rd highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “aj”: aj.

CONJ does not occur with any features.

Relations

CONJ nodes are attached to their parents using 10 different relations: cc (1069; 66% instances), advmod (444; 27% instances), mwe (43; 3% instances), reparandum (20; 1% instances), discourse (19; 1% instances), root (19; 1% instances), cc:preconj (13; 1% instances), parataxis (2; 0% instances), case (1; 0% instances), parataxis:restart (1; 0% instances)

Parents of CONJ nodes belong to 15 different parts of speech: VERB (935; 57% instances), NOUN (272; 17% instances), ADJ (134; 8% instances), PRON (68; 4% instances), CONJ (59; 4% instances), ADV (56; 3% instances), PROPN (45; 3% instances), ROOT (19; 1% instances), PART (15; 1% instances), NUM (12; 1% instances), X (7; 0% instances), AUX (5; 0% instances), ADP (2; 0% instances), DET (1; 0% instances), SCONJ (1; 0% instances)

1497 (92%) CONJ nodes are leaves.

123 (8%) CONJ nodes have one child.

9 (1%) CONJ nodes have two children.

2 (0%) CONJ nodes have three or more children.

The highest child degree of a CONJ node is 4.

Children of CONJ nodes are attached using 10 different relations: mwe (90; 60% instances), reparandum (28; 19% instances), discourse (13; 9% instances), discourse:filler (7; 5% instances), punct (5; 3% instances), cc (2; 1% instances), advcl (1; 1% instances), mark (1; 1% instances), parataxis (1; 1% instances), vocative (1; 1% instances)

Children of CONJ nodes belong to 8 different parts of speech: CONJ (59; 40% instances), SCONJ (49; 33% instances), X (16; 11% instances), PART (12; 8% instances), INTJ (8; 5% instances), NOUN (2; 1% instances), VERB (2; 1% instances), PRON (1; 1% instances)

---

CONJ in other languages: [bg] [cs] [de] [el] [en] [es] [eu] [fa] [fi] [fr] [ga] [he] [hu] [it] [ja] [ko] [sv] [u]

© 2014 Universal Dependencies contributors. Site powered by Annodoc and brat

.