This is part of archived UD v1 documentation. See http://universaldependencies.org/ for the current version.

home la/pos issue tracker

SCONJ: subordinating conjunction

This document is a placeholder for the language-specific documentation for SCONJ.

---

Treebank Statistics (UD_Latin)

There are 56 SCONJ lemmas (1%), 44 SCONJ types (0%) and 1205 SCONJ tokens (3%). Out of 12 observed tags, the rank of SCONJ is: 8 in number of lemmas, 9 in number of types and 9 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent SCONJ lemmas: ut1, si1, cum1, quod1, ne1, ut, cum, quam1, ubi1, quia1

The 10 most frequent SCONJ types: ut, si, cum, quod, ne, dum, quia, quam, ubi, nisi

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: ut1 (SCONJ 185, ADV 20, CONJ 1), si1 (SCONJ 171, CONJ 1), cum1 (SCONJ 128, ADP 120, CONJ 10), quod1 (SCONJ 71, CONJ 14), ne1 (ADV 171, SCONJ 69, CONJ 33), ut (SCONJ 60, CONJ 6), cum (SCONJ 56, ADP 18), quam1 (ADV 50, SCONJ 48, CONJ 1, PRON 1), ubi1 (SCONJ 47, ADV 16, CONJ 3), quia1 (SCONJ 40, CONJ 1)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: ut (SCONJ 234, ADV 15, CONJ 6), si (SCONJ 190, CONJ 1), cum (SCONJ 153, ADP 135, CONJ 9), quod (PRON 99, SCONJ 71, CONJ 12), ne (ADV 155, SCONJ 66, CONJ 54, INTJ 4), quia (SCONJ 50, CONJ 1), quam (ADV 73, SCONJ 48, PRON 46, CONJ 1), ubi (SCONJ 47, ADV 19, CONJ 3), nisi (SCONJ 35, CONJ 6), postquam (SCONJ 21, ADV 2, CONJ 1)

• ut
  • SCONJ 234: ut mentiar , nullius patrimonium tanti facio
  • ADV 15: Ferrum optimum daturus est , sine fuga , carnarium in medio , ut amphitheater videat
  • CONJ 6: Mutandum tibi propositum est ut vitae genus , Intrare si Musarum limen cogitas .
• si
  • SCONJ 190: c Ne tamen derisit , etiam si fugit
  • CONJ 1: nisi vero si quis est qui Catilinae similis cum Catilina sentire non putet
• cum
  • SCONJ 153: Et tu cum esses capo , cocococo , atque cor non habebas
  • ADP 135: Numquam est fidelis cum potente societas :
  • CONJ 9: Et puto , cum vicensimariis magnam mantissam habet
• quod
  • PRON 99: quod semel destinavi , clavo tabulari fixum est
  • SCONJ 71: Ego , quod me sic vides , propter artificium meum diis gratias ago
  • CONJ 12: quod ego si verbo adsequi possem , istos ipsos eicerem qui haec loquuntur
• ne
  • ADV 155: Ac ne sic quidem putidissimam eius iactationem licuit effugere
  • SCONJ 66: Itaque hilaria mera sint , etsi timeo istos scholasticos , ne me rideant
  • CONJ 54: nescio quid nunc taces c ne muttis
  • INTJ 4: ne Tu igitur demens , c ne te mea cura moratur
• quia
  • SCONJ 50: Et quia bonam mentem habet , attuli illi Roma munus cultros Norico ferro
  • CONJ 1: an quia parva damus mutato signa colore , et non ulla meo clamat in ore fides
• quam
  • ADV 73: Satius est rideri quam derideri
  • SCONJ 48: hosce ego non tam milites acris quam infitiatores lentos esse arbitror
  • PRON 46: Mox silentio facto scitis inquit quam fabulam agant
  • CONJ 1: quam diu mihi consuli designato , Catilina , insidiatus es , non publico me praesidio , sed privata diligentia defendi
• ubi
  • SCONJ 47: Haec ubi dicta dedit , talem fabulam exorsus est
  • ADV 19: Humiles laborant ubi potentes dissident .
  • CONJ 3: que Quaesitis diu terris , ubi sistere possit , in mare lassatis volucris vaga decidit alis
• nisi
  • SCONJ 35: Qui mori timore nisi ego
  • CONJ 6: itaque quamdiu vixerit , habebit stigmam , c ne illam nisi Orcus delebit
• postquam
  • SCONJ 21: Qui postquam caede fessus est , asinum evocat Iubet que vocem premere .
  • ADV 2: Hoc facto putabat se solium Iovis tenere , utique postquam Caesar illi dixit
  • CONJ 1: postquam illos videt queri de avaritia magistratuum , accusare senatum , quod in eo auxili nihil esset , miseriis suis remedium mortem expectare , ‘ at ego ‘ inquit ‘ vobis , si modo viri esse voltis , rationem ostendam , qua tanta ista mala effugiatis

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of SCONJ is 0.785714 (the average of all parts of speech is 1.829408).

The 1st highest number of forms (3) was observed with the lemma “cum1”: cum, cumque, quom.

The 2nd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “cum”: cum, quon.

The 3rd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “donec1”: done, donec.

SCONJ does not occur with any features.

Relations

SCONJ nodes are attached to their parents using 1 different relations: mark (1205; 100% instances)

Parents of SCONJ nodes belong to 9 different parts of speech: VERB (1061; 88% instances), ADJ (57; 5% instances), NOUN (45; 4% instances), ADV (16; 1% instances), PUNCT (16; 1% instances), CONJ (4; 0% instances), PRON (4; 0% instances), NUM (1; 0% instances), X (1; 0% instances)

1158 (96%) SCONJ nodes are leaves.

31 (3%) SCONJ nodes have one child.

9 (1%) SCONJ nodes have two children.

7 (1%) SCONJ nodes have three or more children.

The highest child degree of a SCONJ node is 4.

Children of SCONJ nodes are attached using 10 different relations: nsubj (16; 23% instances), dobj (13; 18% instances), advmod (12; 17% instances), nmod (9; 13% instances), punct (6; 8% instances), xcomp (6; 8% instances), advcl (5; 7% instances), iobj (2; 3% instances), acl (1; 1% instances), ccomp (1; 1% instances)

Children of SCONJ nodes belong to 8 different parts of speech: NOUN (32; 45% instances), ADJ (10; 14% instances), VERB (10; 14% instances), ADV (7; 10% instances), PUNCT (6; 8% instances), PRON (4; 6% instances), CONJ (1; 1% instances), X (1; 1% instances)

---

Treebank Statistics (UD_Latin-ITTB)

There are 53 SCONJ lemmas (1%), 55 SCONJ types (0%) and 15763 SCONJ tokens (5%). Out of 15 observed tags, the rank of SCONJ is: 7 in number of lemmas, 10 in number of types and 8 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent SCONJ lemmas: quod, ut, sicut, quia, cum, si, nisi, in+quantum, quam, quamvis

The 10 most frequent SCONJ types: quod, ut, sicut, quia, cum, si, nisi, inquantum, quam, quamvis

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: quod (SCONJ 4817, PRON 4, X 2, ADV 2), ut (SCONJ 2234, ADV 2), sicut (SCONJ 2152, CONJ 1), quia (SCONJ 1295, ADV 5), cum (SCONJ 1246, ADP 207), si (SCONJ 1237, ADV 1), in+quantum (SCONJ 471, ADV 1), quam (SCONJ 444, CONJ 23, X 1), quamvis (SCONJ 153, ADV 1), licet (SCONJ 116, VERB 7)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: quod (SCONJ 4817, PRON 2226, X 7, ADV 2), ut (SCONJ 2234, ADV 2), sicut (SCONJ 2148, CONJ 1), quia (SCONJ 1295, ADV 5), cum (SCONJ 1246, ADP 207), si (SCONJ 1237, ADV 1), inquantum (SCONJ 474, ADV 1), quam (SCONJ 444, PRON 385, CONJ 23, X 1), quamvis (SCONJ 153, ADV 1), licet (SCONJ 117, VERB 5)

• quod
  • SCONJ 4817: unum est quod paucis hominibus dei cognitio inesset .
  • PRON 2226: quod sit officium sapientis .
  • X 7: quod distinctio rerum non est a casu .
  • ADV 2: quod autem est malum , non habet causam in natura :
• ut
  • SCONJ 2234: tum etiam propter multa quae praeexiguntur , ut dictum est .
  • ADV 2: esse igitur actu boni rationem constituit : unde et per privationem actus a potentia consequitur malum , quod est bono oppositum , ut per philosophum patet , in ix metaphysicae .
• sicut
  • SCONJ 2148: sic enim est dispositio rerum in veritate sicut in esse .
  • CONJ 1: nihil igitur prohibet et horum providentiam esse , sicut incorruptibilium et universalium .
• quia
  • SCONJ 1295: quia vero non omnis veritatis manifestandae modus est idem ;
  • ADV 5: sunt enim debilium oculorum , quia parva luce moventur , ad multam autem confunduntur .
• cum
  • SCONJ 1246: cum sint effectus causae virtutem non aequantes .
  • ADP 207: quantum enim ad modum significandi , omne nomen cum defectu est .
• si
  • SCONJ 1237: si autem movetur , ergo ab alio movente movetur .
  • ADV 1: cum autem impossibile sit naturale desiderium esse inane , quod quidem esset si non esset possibile pervenire ad divinam substantiam intelligendam , quod naturaliter omnes mentes desiderant ; necesse est dicere quod possibile sit substantiam dei videri per intellectum , et a substantiis intellectualibus separatis , et ab animabus nostris .
• inquantum
  • SCONJ 474: sed omne quod movetur , inquantum huiusmodi , est in potentia :
  • ADV 1: per similitudinem tamen aliqua deo dare dicimur , inquantum nostra data deus acceptat .
• quam
  • SCONJ 444: cognoscit quidem angelus deum ex nobiliori effectu quam homo :
  • PRON 385: quam etiam innuit commentator in ii physicorum .
  • CONJ 23: quod quidem apparet tam in scientiis speculativis quam in activis :
  • X 1: quod tam de corpore circulari quam de recto probatur in i caeli et mundi .
• quamvis
  • SCONJ 153: sic autem statua est homogenea , quamvis non secundum formam artificialem .
  • ADV 1: et quoniam praelatio secundum suam formam semper a deo est ( quod debitum obedientiae causat ) ; ideo talibus praelatis , quamvis indignis , obedire tenentur subditi .
• licet
  • SCONJ 117: et hoc repraesentatur in corporalibus creaturis , licet per alium modum :
  • VERB 5: ergo non licet addere vel diminuere in forma .

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of SCONJ is 1.037736 (the average of all parts of speech is 3.667841).

The 1st highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “quandiu”: quamdiu, quandiu.

The 2nd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “quantum”: inquantum, quantum.

The 3rd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “sicut”: sicut, sicuti.

SCONJ does not occur with any features.

Relations

SCONJ nodes are attached to their parents using 8 different relations: mark (15573; 99% instances), mwe (153; 1% instances), cc (16; 0% instances), advmod (9; 0% instances), advmod:emph (8; 0% instances), nmod (2; 0% instances), case (1; 0% instances), xcomp (1; 0% instances)

Parents of SCONJ nodes belong to 11 different parts of speech: VERB (10465; 66% instances), NOUN (3220; 20% instances), ADJ (1182; 7% instances), PRON (382; 2% instances), ADV (336; 2% instances), NUM (90; 1% instances), PROPN (43; 0% instances), SCONJ (22; 0% instances), CONJ (19; 0% instances), ADP (3; 0% instances), PUNCT (1; 0% instances)

15704 (100%) SCONJ nodes are leaves.

50 (0%) SCONJ nodes have one child.

9 (0%) SCONJ nodes have two children.

The highest child degree of a SCONJ node is 2.

Children of SCONJ nodes are attached using 3 different relations: mwe (43; 63% instances), punct (15; 22% instances), advcl (10; 15% instances)

Children of SCONJ nodes belong to 8 different parts of speech: SCONJ (22; 32% instances), ADV (17; 25% instances), PUNCT (14; 21% instances), VERB (10; 15% instances), NOUN (2; 3% instances), ADJ (1; 1% instances), ADP (1; 1% instances), PRON (1; 1% instances)

---

Treebank Statistics (UD_Latin-PROIEL)

There are 42 SCONJ lemmas (1%), 50 SCONJ types (0%) and 5319 SCONJ tokens (3%). Out of 13 observed tags, the rank of SCONJ is: 9 in number of lemmas, 10 in number of types and 9 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent SCONJ lemmas: ut, cum, si, quia, quod, ne, quoniam, dum, nisi, donec

The 10 most frequent SCONJ types: ut, cum, si, quia, quod, ne, quoniam, dum, nisi, donec

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: ut (SCONJ 1359, ADV 291), cum (SCONJ 992, ADP 838, ADV 47), si (SCONJ 859, ADV 12), quia (SCONJ 675, ADV 31), ne (ADV 715, SCONJ 249), quoniam (SCONJ 220, ADV 8), dum (SCONJ 67, ADV 2), nisi (ADV 106, SCONJ 65), quin (SCONJ 28, ADV 8), etsi (SCONJ 24, ADV 6)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: ut (SCONJ 1308, ADV 325), cum (SCONJ 938, ADP 832, ADV 45), si (SCONJ 844, ADV 11), quia (SCONJ 675, ADV 31), quod (PRON 550, SCONJ 474, ADV 19), ne (ADV 704, SCONJ 249), quoniam (SCONJ 218, ADV 8), dum (SCONJ 58, ADV 2), nisi (ADV 106, SCONJ 64), uti (SCONJ 50, VERB 14, ADV 1)

• ut
  • SCONJ 1308: metu territare non sine causa fieri ut Gallia omni nobilitate spoliaretur
  • ADV 325: hunc ego accepi in senatu ut soleo sed nihil est illo homine lentius
• cum
  • SCONJ 938: qui potui non videre cum per emporium Puteolanorum iter facerem
  • ADP 832: velle sese de re publica et summis utriusque rebus cum eo agere
  • ADV 45: Eandem virtutem istam veniet tempus cum graviter gemes
• si
  • SCONJ 844: si id non fecissent longe iis fraternum nomen populi Romani afuturum
  • ADV 11: Domine si percutimus in gladio
• quia
  • SCONJ 675: et videntes eum supra mare ambulantem turbati sunt dicentes quia
  • ADV 31: etiam Pater quia sic placuit ante te
• quod
  • PRON 550: Tum demum Liscus oratione Caesaris adductus quod antea tacuerat proponit
  • SCONJ 474: accedit eo quod mihi non ut quisque in Epirum proficiscitur
  • ADV 19: quod si opus esset omnes in abrogando uterentur
• ne
  • ADV 704: si ne id quidem nummi potius reddantur quam ullus sit scrupulus
  • SCONJ 249: per eos ne causam diceret se eripuit
• quoniam
  • SCONJ 218: si quid in te peccavi ac potius quoniam peccavi ignosce
  • ADV 8: quoniam si est ex hominibus consilium hoc aut opus dissolvetur
• dum
  • SCONJ 58: factum est autem dum irent et ipse intravit in quoddam castellum
  • ADV 2: dum acta et rumores vel etiam si qua certa habes de Caesare exspecto
• nisi
  • ADV 106: numquam ante arbitror te epistulam meam legisse nisi mea manu scriptam
  • SCONJ 64: nisi subsidium sibi submittatur sese diutius sustinere non posse
• uti
  • SCONJ 50: qua ex re futurum uti totius Galliae animi a se averterentur
  • VERB 14: ne metu necesse sit iis uti vereor
  • ADV 1: alter uti dixit Isocrates in Ephoro et Theopompo frenis eget alter calcaribus

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of SCONJ is 1.190476 (the average of all parts of speech is 3.304580).

The 1st highest number of forms (3) was observed with the lemma “antequam”: ante-quam, ante.quam, antequam.

The 2nd highest number of forms (3) was observed with the lemma “posteaquam”: Postea-quam, postea.quam, posteaquam.

The 3rd highest number of forms (2) was observed with the lemma “cum”: cum, quom.

SCONJ does not occur with any features.

Relations

SCONJ nodes are attached to their parents using 10 different relations: mark (5148; 97% instances), ccomp (84; 2% instances), advmod (31; 1% instances), conj (17; 0% instances), appos (12; 0% instances), aux (10; 0% instances), advcl (9; 0% instances), csubjpass (6; 0% instances), remnant (1; 0% instances), root (1; 0% instances)

Parents of SCONJ nodes belong to 11 different parts of speech: VERB (4735; 89% instances), NOUN (189; 4% instances), ADJ (183; 3% instances), ADV (83; 2% instances), PROPN (54; 1% instances), PRON (41; 1% instances), SCONJ (20; 0% instances), NUM (9; 0% instances), X (3; 0% instances), ADP (1; 0% instances), ROOT (1; 0% instances)

5013 (94%) SCONJ nodes are leaves.

170 (3%) SCONJ nodes have one child.

90 (2%) SCONJ nodes have two children.

46 (1%) SCONJ nodes have three or more children.

The highest child degree of a SCONJ node is 6.

Children of SCONJ nodes are attached using 15 different relations: conj (143; 29% instances), cc (121; 24% instances), advmod (79; 16% instances), discourse (41; 8% instances), nsubj (21; 4% instances), remnant (20; 4% instances), neg (16; 3% instances), iobj (15; 3% instances), nmod (11; 2% instances), advcl (9; 2% instances), dobj (7; 1% instances), mwe (7; 1% instances), ccomp (6; 1% instances), appos (2; 0% instances), aux (2; 0% instances)

Children of SCONJ nodes belong to 9 different parts of speech: ADV (140; 28% instances), VERB (123; 25% instances), CONJ (121; 24% instances), NOUN (32; 6% instances), PRON (32; 6% instances), ADJ (25; 5% instances), SCONJ (20; 4% instances), PROPN (5; 1% instances), X (2; 0% instances)

---

SCONJ in other languages: [bg] [cs] [de] [el] [en] [es] [eu] [fa] [fi] [fr] [ga] [he] [hu] [it] [ja] [ko] [sv] [u]

© 2014 Universal Dependencies contributors. Site powered by Annodoc and brat

.