home edit page issue tracker

Treebank Statistics: UD_English-GUM: POS Tags: INTJ

There are 170 INTJ lemmas (1%), 170 INTJ types (1%) and 2480 INTJ tokens (1%). Out of 17 observed tags, the rank of INTJ is: 8 in number of lemmas, 8 in number of types and 15 in number of tokens.

The 10 most frequent INTJ lemmas: like, yeah, uh, oh, um, well, so, no, okay, yes

The 10 most frequent INTJ types: like, yeah, uh, oh, um, well, so, no, okay, yes

The 10 most frequent ambiguous lemmas: like (ADP 311, INTJ 295, VERB 129, SCONJ 79, ADJ 25, NOUN 5, ADV 1), yeah (INTJ 277, ADV 1), uh (INTJ 226, PROPN 1), um (INTJ 186, NOUN 2), well (ADV 222, INTJ 182, ADJ 2, NOUN 2), so (ADV 700, INTJ 160, SCONJ 73), no (DET 226, INTJ 123, ADV 25, X 1), okay (INTJ 105, ADJ 15, ADV 4, NOUN 1), alright (INTJ 46, ADV 4, ADJ 3), please (INTJ 22, VERB 12)

The 10 most frequent ambiguous types: like (ADP 298, INTJ 275, VERB 113, SCONJ 75, ADJ 25, NOUN 2, ADV 1), yeah (INTJ 73, ADV 1), uh (INTJ 176, PROPN 1), um (INTJ 101, NOUN 1), well (ADV 175, INTJ 38, ADJ 1, NOUN 1), so (ADV 469, SCONJ 71, INTJ 35), no (DET 203, INTJ 44, ADV 24, X 1), okay (INTJ 16, ADJ 15, ADV 4, NOUN 1), alright (INTJ 5, ADJ 3, ADV 1), please (VERB 11, INTJ 10)

• like
  • ADP 298: My hair looks like a mess .
  • INTJ 275: It ‘s f- like on Saturdays and Wednesdays .
  • VERB 113: I ‘d like to go out to dinner though .
  • SCONJ 75: It is like giving full fridge privileges to your Labrador .
  • ADJ 25: However , it is not enough to have attained such native - like levels .
  • NOUN 2: Yeah I press the like button .
  • ADV 1: Zombie - like he sank down into the seat , watching as if from outside his body as his hands buckled him in , his fingers flip switches , press buttons , acknowledge questions and confirmations on the screens before him .
• yeah
  • INTJ 73: Oh , yeah .
  • ADV 1: But if somebody wakes up one morning and suddenly no longer is funny , then yeah , head first , out the door as quickly as possible , and as sadistically as possible .
• uh
  • INTJ 176: Yeah but , not at uh —
  • PROPN 1: Additionally , in the Kennedy versus Washington uh matter , the Federal Circuit Court stated that the Green versus United States implied acquittal would generally apply in cases where the provocation mitigator was at issue .
• um
  • INTJ 101: Then , down there , um , it ‘s mandatory .
  • NOUN 1: In looking at Green versus United States and the courts , the high court out of the state of Texas and the federal circuits in Kennedy versus Washington on this constitutional issue , I believe that the authority uh exists to find that collateral estoppel would preclude the defendant from having to prove these mitigators a second time to a different jury because he preserved the issue by requesting the jury instruction for the mitigators on all of the applicable counts , and he did n’t request that the jury – or concede to permit the jury to be discharged without considering those mitigators , when the jury did n’t consider them and the additional counts , it acted almost as an applied acquittal or an applied um finding towards this affirmative defense .
• well
  • ADV 175: Um , that ‘s pretty well , like secure right there , so maybe —
  • INTJ 38: W- w- well that ‘s kind of bogus .
  • ADJ 1: • Reduced anger , increased self - control and a greater sense of well - being are other documented benefits of walking , according to 100 Reasons to Walk , issued by Walk with a Doc , an organization of physicians working in 29 states .
  • NOUN 1: It is a one - room house , but a large room , and set in two blocks of grounds with an artesian well .
• so
  • ADV 469: You ‘re so stupid thinking I spent the night .
  • SCONJ 71: All I need is your signature so I can play the volleyball .
  • INTJ 35: Alright so let ‘s start off with the bed and the couch area .
• no
  • DET 203: ” A person who acts without reasonable care does no wrong in law .
  • INTJ 44: And she goes , no just spend the night .
  • ADV 24: The sky was no longer blue .
  • X 1: It was published in the prestigious journal Miyako no Hana in 1892 , only nine months after she had started writing in earnest .
• okay
  • INTJ 16: Oh okay .
  • ADJ 15: No , it ‘s okay .
  • ADV 4: So I hit okay ?
  • NOUN 1: Press okay .
• alright
  • INTJ 5: And I said , well , I – alright .
  • ADJ 3: N- that ‘s alright .
  • ADV 1: And you just double down for that performance of it because it ‘s hilarious that your mind thought something was , you know , you have to like be sort of reflective in moments like that of like , okay , yeah , alright , that ‘s fine .
• please
  • VERB 11: Mr. Chief Justice , may it please the Court :
  • INTJ 10: Let it fucking die , please , just stop .

Morphology

The form / lemma ratio of INTJ is 1.000000 (the average of all parts of speech is 1.248450).

The 1st highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “C-”: C-.

The 2nd highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “Cap-”: Cap-.

The 3rd highest number of forms (1) was observed with the lemma “OK”: OK.

INTJ occurs with 5 features: Polarity (477; 19% instances), Typo (15; 1% instances), Style (8; 0% instances), Abbr (5; 0% instances), Foreign (1; 0% instances)

INTJ occurs with 6 feature-value pairs: Abbr=Yes, Foreign=Yes, Polarity=Neg, Polarity=Pos, Style=Expr, Typo=Yes

INTJ occurs with 7 feature combinations. The most frequent feature combination is _ (1974 tokens). Examples: like, uh, oh, um, well, so, okay, alright, Mhm, hi

Relations

INTJ nodes are attached to their parents using 18 different relations: discourse (1689; 68% instances), root (521; 21% instances), reparandum (145; 6% instances), conj (37; 1% instances), ccomp (31; 1% instances), obj (11; 0% instances), parataxis (11; 0% instances), flat (10; 0% instances), nsubj (9; 0% instances), advcl (4; 0% instances), nmod (3; 0% instances), acl:relcl (2; 0% instances), obl (2; 0% instances), advcl:relcl (1; 0% instances), appos (1; 0% instances), case (1; 0% instances), compound (1; 0% instances), xcomp (1; 0% instances)

Parents of INTJ nodes belong to 15 different parts of speech: VERB (934; 38% instances), (521; 21% instances), NOUN (385; 16% instances), ADJ (181; 7% instances), INTJ (136; 5% instances), ADV (74; 3% instances), PROPN (70; 3% instances), PRON (60; 2% instances), AUX (57; 2% instances), NUM (37; 1% instances), DET (10; 0% instances), ADP (5; 0% instances), PART (5; 0% instances), X (4; 0% instances), CCONJ (1; 0% instances)

884 (36%) INTJ nodes are leaves.

1338 (54%) INTJ nodes have one child.

183 (7%) INTJ nodes have two children.

75 (3%) INTJ nodes have three or more children.

The highest child degree of a INTJ node is 9.

Children of INTJ nodes are attached using 25 different relations: punct (1678; 85% instances), discourse (75; 4% instances), conj (33; 2% instances), nsubj (20; 1% instances), parataxis (19; 1% instances), reparandum (17; 1% instances), cc (14; 1% instances), advmod (13; 1% instances), det (13; 1% instances), nmod:poss (12; 1% instances), case (11; 1% instances), obl (10; 1% instances), flat (9; 0% instances), vocative (9; 0% instances), cop (7; 0% instances), mark (7; 0% instances), aux (5; 0% instances), advcl (3; 0% instances), amod (3; 0% instances), nmod (2; 0% instances), nummod (2; 0% instances), obj (2; 0% instances), compound (1; 0% instances), expl (1; 0% instances), orphan (1; 0% instances)

Children of INTJ nodes belong to 16 different parts of speech: PUNCT (1678; 85% instances), INTJ (136; 7% instances), PRON (38; 2% instances), CCONJ (15; 1% instances), NOUN (14; 1% instances), DET (13; 1% instances), ADP (12; 1% instances), ADV (12; 1% instances), AUX (12; 1% instances), VERB (9; 0% instances), ADJ (7; 0% instances), PROPN (7; 0% instances), PART (5; 0% instances), SCONJ (5; 0% instances), NUM (3; 0% instances), X (1; 0% instances)

© 2014–2024 Universal Dependencies contributors. Site powered by Annodoc and brat

.